Skip to content

Conversation

@lightsing
Copy link
Member

@lightsing lightsing commented Feb 18, 2025

closes: #143

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 18, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #158 will not alter performance

Comparing feat/euclid-v2 (e65a35e) with scroll (a337c97)

Summary

✅ 77 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Collaborator

@greged93 greged93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the help on this! I think we might be missing modifications to the following related to Euclid:

  • ScrollHardforkInfo for struct itself.
  • ScrollHardfork for scroll_mainnet and scroll_sepolia.
  • impl From<Genesis> for ScrollChainSpec for the Euclid changes.

Self::Curie => Some(7096836),
Self::Darwin => Some(8568134),
Self::DarwinV2 => Some(8923772),
_ => None,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we have Self::Euclid and Self::EuclidV2 as Some(0)?

Copy link
Member Author

@lightsing lightsing Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that's something TBD?
Some(0) means enabled on the genesis which should not be as expected?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh right, maybe just add a TODO?

Copy link
Collaborator

@greged93 greged93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just realized we also need to modify the ScrollExecutionStrategy implementation of the BlockExecutionStrategy::execute_transactions, to only skip EIP-7702 transactions before Euclid.

@frisitano
Copy link
Collaborator

Can we close this PR @greged93 @lightsing?

@frisitano
Copy link
Collaborator

frisitano commented May 21, 2025

closing due to inactivity.

@frisitano frisitano closed this May 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EIP-7702 Support

4 participants